F35 Actualité
+20
vonrichthoffen
Alexandry2
Alessandry
J_Lag
Forsythe
Upset
Quentin_Y2
LVGriss
Welling
Fowl
Thipail
VictorK
Admin
Zitek
Paddy
Cougar9
LynxFleet
SEVRIEN
SEAFOX
Jeannot
24 participants
Page 11 sur 11
Page 11 sur 11 • 1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11
Re: F35 Actualité
par Jeannot Jeu 19 Avr 2012, 16:10
Une nouvelle augmentation importante des prix du F35 pourrait pousser la Norvège à reviser sa participation au programme.
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
Further dramatic F-35 cost increases could force Norway to reconsider programme
If there is a further dramatic cost increase on the Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF), Norway will reconsider its participation in the programme.
"If there should happen to be something that would really affect the cost curves in the next months, in the next years, all nations including Norway will, of course, reconsider the whole project," says Norway's state secretary for Defence, Roger Ingebrigtsen. "I have no reasons to believe that. I was more nervous two years ago than I am today."
Should something go horribly wrong, however, Norway would be forced to reconsider the programme, he says. But Norway needs the F-35.
The best we can get is the F-35," Ingebrigtsen says. There is a reason that a nation like Japan, which has signed onto the programme comparatively late, has selected the stealthy fifth-generation jet for its arsenal, he says. But US support for the F-35 is critical.
"I hope the politicians in the United States stay strong on the F-35 programme," he says.
The country will buy 52 of the jets. But even with its increasing oil wealth, the Nordic nation cannot afford to pay for all of those aircraft at the same time. So the country will have to stagger its procurements.
"It's really a huge sum of money," Ingebrigtsen says. "Therefore we have to spread it out."
For Norway, the F-35 is its largest ever defence procurement. The runner-up is Lockheed's own F-16, which Norway bought in 1977, Ingebrigtsen says.
Getting the F-35 on the timeline it has set is important for the country because its F-16s will reach the end of their lives around 2020-2022. The country will start off its procurement with four jets in 2015, which will be used for training. A further six would be purchased in 2017. Later jets would be bought in 2022 through 2023, but buys could stretch through 2024 if necessary.
But Norway wants the US to jointly integrate the Kongsberg Joint Strike Missile onto the F-35, and it wants the US to sign onto the programme, Ingebrigtsen says. The weapons could be useful to the US against ships and land targets. After a series of meetings with US officials, Ingebrigtsen says, "We feel [confident] that the United States supports this missile."
Another issue that affects the Norwegian F-35 buy is the installation of a braking parachute to operate on icy runways in the far north. The country needs that parachute for its fleet and if the problem cannot be resolved by 2015, that could delay a Norwegian buy.
"Lockheed Martin needs to solve this," he says. "We need parachutes on the first fighter we procure."
Meanwhile, Norway is in discussions to replace a Lockheed C-130J Hercules that crashed earlier in the year. But the cause of that crash has not yet been discovered, the investigation cannot be completed until the summer when the weather is warmer.
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
Jeannot- Membre
- Messages : 10002
Localisation : Vexin 78
Re: F35 Actualité
par SEVRIEN Dim 24 Juin 2012, 15:43
Bonjour, chers tous !
Même si personne ne l'avoue ouvertement (il ne faut pas trop espérer des bandes de lâches et d'hypocrites, qui ont eu 'tout faux', qui ont adopté des 'raisonnements' qui n'en étaient pas, qui ont écouté un militaire américain haut gradé, qui 'parlait coûts', sans vraiment connaître le sujet, quelqu'un, quelque part aux USA, se réveille et envoie des signaux qui indiquent qu'il se rend compte que l'absence de concurrence permet à P&W de se contenter de 'pochettes de médiocrité' qui nuisent à l'excellence requise !
Ne va-t-on pas commencer à revoir le F-136 de GE-RR ? A voir. On ne peut jurer de rien !
Lien :
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
-------------------
Combat Engine Demo Plan Troubles F135 Supporters
By Guy Norris, Jen DiMascio, Graham Warwick
Source: [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
May 28, 2012
Guy Norris/Los Angeles and Jen DiMascio and Graham Warwick/washington
Non ! Bien sûr que non ! Mais il l'a déjà fait ! Mais cela est écrit sur une page antérieure, et il espère que les gens oublieront ! Je pense qu'il y a beaucoup de gens qui n'oublieront pas !
Oui, mais ces military planners ne se sont pas exprimer en faveur du moteur F136 de GE-RR, à haute voix, et d'une seule voix, au moment où il le fallait. Mieux vaut tard que jamais ; mais eux aussi se réveillent sur le tard !
A mon avis la crainte est que cela ne puisse avoir l'effet pervers de conforter, de consolider la médiocrité dans un programme déjà jugé insatisfaisant, qui a été attribué exclusivement à un motoriste qui n'a aucune motivation maintenant de faire progresser les technologies et les performances !
Vraiment ?
Même si personne ne l'avoue ouvertement (il ne faut pas trop espérer des bandes de lâches et d'hypocrites, qui ont eu 'tout faux', qui ont adopté des 'raisonnements' qui n'en étaient pas, qui ont écouté un militaire américain haut gradé, qui 'parlait coûts', sans vraiment connaître le sujet, quelqu'un, quelque part aux USA, se réveille et envoie des signaux qui indiquent qu'il se rend compte que l'absence de concurrence permet à P&W de se contenter de 'pochettes de médiocrité' qui nuisent à l'excellence requise !
Ne va-t-on pas commencer à revoir le F-136 de GE-RR ? A voir. On ne peut jurer de rien !
Lien :
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
-------------------
Combat Engine Demo Plan Troubles F135 Supporters
By Guy Norris, Jen DiMascio, Graham Warwick
Source: [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
May 28, 2012
Guy Norris/Los Angeles and Jen DiMascio and Graham Warwick/washington
Si cela commence à envoyer des ondes de choc qui font trembler P&W & les 'supporters & alliés de P&W' moins que candides de "Capital Hill", tant mieux ! Je pense que c'est une chose excellente et salutaire.General Electric and Rolls-Royce's decision to abandon their fight for an alternate engine to power the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter finally put an end to a long, politically charged battle with incumbent Pratt & Whitney. Or did it?
No, the GE-Rolls F136 is not rising from the dead. But a U.S. Air Force demonstrator program, in which GE, Rolls and Pratt are competing separately to develop fuel-saving propulsion technology for combat aircraft, could conceivably produce an alternate engine sized for the JSF as early as 2020. That possibility has sent jitters through Pratt and its allies on Capitol Hill.
Les individus en question auraient pu appliquer la matière qu'ils sont censés avoir entre les 2 oreilles il y a quelques années, .... car cela faisait partie des objectifs de la concurrence en général et de celle fournie / à assurer par la présence de la deuxième motorisation ! Mais tout le monde connaît l'obsession aux USA avec les exclusivités moteurs, malgré l'existence des Autorités Anti-Trust et les déclarations à tout bout de champ sur les vertus de la concurrence !The issue surrounds the adaptive engine technology development (AETD) program, a new effort that is rapidly gaining traction within the Pentagon because of its potential to save up to 25% in fuel burn over state-of-the-art engines. The Pentagon—which actively opposed the F-35 alternate engine plan for five years—supports the initiative run by the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) and sees it as a key part of an energy-saving strategy to keep the Air Force's annual fuel use below 2.4 billion gal.
Il s'est 'réveille' in fine, mais ne peut pas l'avouer ouvertement, car cela soulèverait beaucoup de questions sur ses motivations réelles, derrière ses arguments spécieux à l'époque des débats faussés et truqués ! La réalité est revenue lui mordre les fesses, et certains disent que cela lui fait mal ! Si cela est vrai,tant mieux !Sensing the longer term threat, Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.), the senator most associated with the moves to counter the F136, ......
Ne voulant pas se déjuger, se désavouer, il veut encore la quadrature du cercle ! Et il en est le premier gêné, ... tout comme il l'était, lors de ses raisonnements dans les débats contre le moteur GE-RR, raissonements (? ) qui étaient plus qu'économes avec la vérité !...... is leading efforts to limit any possible impact of AETD on the F-35.
But Lieberman, who leads the Senate Armed Services air-land subcommittee in charge of tactical aircraft, says he will not stop the Pentagon program aiming to develop engines that vastly improve fuel efficiency.
Non ! Bien sûr que non ! Mais il l'a déjà fait ! Mais cela est écrit sur une page antérieure, et il espère que les gens oublieront ! Je pense qu'il y a beaucoup de gens qui n'oublieront pas !
Despite these reassurances, according to insiders, military planners are taking a dim view of what they consider political attempts to emasculate the evolution of U.S. combat engine technology for the benefit of an incumbent manufacturer.
Oui, mais ces military planners ne se sont pas exprimer en faveur du moteur F136 de GE-RR, à haute voix, et d'une seule voix, au moment où il le fallait. Mieux vaut tard que jamais ; mais eux aussi se réveillent sur le tard !
However, of more concern to Pratt is that Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton Carter—a past critic of the company's F135 program—is thought to have asked AFRL to outline provisional schedules for making a production-standard engine available as early as 2020. This is well within the extended procurement schedule of the F-35, and early enough to make a significant impact on the production run of the F135.
A mon avis la crainte est que cela ne puisse avoir l'effet pervers de conforter, de consolider la médiocrité dans un programme déjà jugé insatisfaisant, qui a été attribué exclusivement à un motoriste qui n'a aucune motivation maintenant de faire progresser les technologies et les performances !
Yet the Air Force officially downplays any suggestion of either linking the AETD directly to the F-35 or accelerating its development to make it a possible contender before the early 2020s. Testifying to Congress earlier this year, Steven Walker, deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force for science, technology and engineering, said the official target for AETD is for “follow-on final design, engineering manufacturing development (EMD), and ground and flight-test qualification of a production-ready engine early in the next decade for integration into legacy and future aircraft systems.”
Vraiment ?
Toujours aussi dogmatique M. Lieberman ! Il ne comprend toujours pas la sottise, que lui est ses 'copains' ont déjà faite !The Pentagon has requested $214 million for the AETD in fiscal 2013. Lieberman would not divulge the details of the subcommittee's just-completed draft of the fiscal 2013 defense authorization bill, but says he is trying to “put some parameters” around the program. “I'm going to do everything I can, not to stop this program, but to make sure that it doesn't become a second engine, because that would be a waste of taxpayer money.”
SEVRIEN- Membre
- Messages : 20088
Re: F35 Actualité
par SEVRIEN Jeu 19 Juil 2012, 23:01
Bonjour, chers tous.
---------------------
RR ne manque pas d'humour !
----------------------
Lien :
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
---------------------
Rolls-Royce congratulates UK MoD on delivery of first F-35B Lightning II
Thursday, 19 July 2012
Impressionnant, ... mais cela coûte cher !
Vrai.
Oui.
Oui. Et cela est "du réel" ! Ce n'est pas un ensemble de simulations informatiques !
---------------------
RR ne manque pas d'humour !
----------------------
Lien :
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
---------------------
Rolls-Royce congratulates UK MoD on delivery of first F-35B Lightning II
Thursday, 19 July 2012
Rolls-Royce, the global power systems company, today congratulated the UK Ministry of Defence on the delivery of their first F-35B Lightning II aircraft.
Dan Korte, Rolls-Royce, President – Defence, said, "Rolls-Royce offers our sincere congratulations to the UK Ministry of Defence on this important milestone. We are proud of our unique, advanced technology in the Rolls-Royce LiftSystem®, which provides this aircraft with its vertical-lift capability."
The F-35B Lightning II is the only fighter aircraft in the world to combine Short Take Off and Vertical Landing (STOVL) technology with supersonic speed and stealth capability. The STOVL jets, which will also be flown by the US Marine Corps, will allow short-deck ship operations or enable fighter capability from austere, forward operating bases.
Impressionnant, ... mais cela coûte cher !
Rolls-Royce is the only company in the world with the technology to produce the LiftSystem, which comprises a Rolls-Royce LiftFan, Roll Posts and 3-bearing swivel module.
Vrai.
The unique STOVL capability is provided by the F-35B’s propulsion system, pairing a Pratt & Whitney F135 engine and the Rolls-Royce LiftSystem.
Oui.
In 2012, F-35B STOVL jets have completed more than 200 flights, with more than 130 short take-offs and 55 vertical landings. Overall, F-35B STOVL jets have flown approximately 800 flights, with more than 550 short takeoffs and 330 vertical landings.
Oui. Et cela est "du réel" ! Ce n'est pas un ensemble de simulations informatiques !
SEVRIEN- Membre
- Messages : 20088
Re: F35 Actualité
par SEVRIEN Jeu 19 Juil 2012, 23:27
Rebonjour !
Le RU avance dans ses commandes du F-35.
----------------
Lien :
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
-----------------
UK to order fourth F-35B next year, Hammond says
By: [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien] London
7 hours ago : 19 / 07 / 2012
Source: [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
Noté !
Dossier à suivre.
Le RU avance dans ses commandes du F-35.
----------------
Lien :
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
-----------------
UK to order fourth F-35B next year, Hammond says
By: [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien] London
7 hours ago : 19 / 07 / 2012
Source: [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
The UK has taken delivery of its first of three F-35B Joint Strike Fighter test aircraft at Lockheed Martin’s Fort Worth site in Texas, while defence secretary Philip Hammond has announced plans to order a fourth example next year.
Short take-off and vertical landing aircraft BK-1 will soon be transferred to Eglin AFB in Florida to join US-led initial operational test and evaluation (IOT&E) of the F-35.
Noté !
Lockheed Martin |
Hammond also revealed that the Ministry of Defence currently favours the Royal Air Force’s Marham base in Norfolk to become the main operating site for its F-35B Lightning IIs, "but that no decision has yet been made". Land-based trials of the type are due to commence in the UK in 2018, following the nation’s involvement in the IOT&E phase of the programme.
To be flown by RAF and Royal Navy pilots, the UK’s F-35Bs will also be operated from at least one of the latter service’s future two Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carriers from around 2020.
Dossier à suivre.
SEVRIEN- Membre
- Messages : 20088
Re: F35 Actualité
par Jeannot Ven 07 Sep 2012, 10:59
Pour le Japon le prix d'acquisition d'un F35 n'est pas réellement à la baisse.
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
U.S. stealth jets may cost 50% more
Each F-35 stealth jet that Japan buys from the United States in fiscal 2013 will be 50 percent more expensive than in the current year, according to Defense Ministry officials.
The ministry cited lower production efficiency for the price hike — which will see the acquisition cost soar to ¥15.4 billion from ¥10.2 billion per aircraft — and plans to buy two F-35s in the next fiscal year, the officials said Tuesday.
To this end, the ministry will seek ¥30.8 billion to cover the acquisition costs in the fiscal 2013 budget request it must submit by Friday, they added.
Japan plans to purchase a total of 42 F-35s and signed a contract to acquire the first four at a price of around ¥10.2 billion each in fiscal 2012. The four aircraft are scheduled for delivery by fiscal 2016. Last December, Japan announced it had selected the F-35 to replace the Air Self-Defense Force's aging fleet of F-4s and become its next-generation fighter jet.
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
Jeannot- Membre
- Messages : 10002
Localisation : Vexin 78
Re: F35 Actualité
par SEVRIEN Ven 07 Sep 2012, 13:50
Bonjour. Merci, Jeannot ! Pour le Japon le prix d'acquisition d'un F35 n'est pas réellement à la baisse.
Oui ! Il a souvent été dit que, lorsque le Japon voulait un avion, .... le prix ne comptait pas (ou bien, 'on ne comptait plus) !
On verra !
U.S. stealth jets may cost 50% more
Each F-35 stealth jet that Japan buys from the United States in fiscal 2013 will be 50 percent more expensive than in the current year, according to Defense Ministry officials.
The ministry cited lower production efficiency for the price hike — which will see the acquisition cost soar to ¥15.4 billion from ¥10.2 billion per aircraft — and plans to buy two F-35s in the next fiscal year, the officials said Tuesday.
To this end, the ministry will seek ¥30.8 billion to cover the acquisition costs in the fiscal 2013 budget request it must submit by Friday, they added.
Japan plans to purchase a total of 42 F-35s and signed a contract to acquire the first four at a price of around ¥10.2 billion each in fiscal 2012. The four aircraft are scheduled for delivery by fiscal 2016. Last December, Japan announced it had selected the F-35 to replace the Air Self-Defense Force's aging fleet of F-4s and become its next-generation fighter jet.
Oui ! Il a souvent été dit que, lorsque le Japon voulait un avion, .... le prix ne comptait pas (ou bien, 'on ne comptait plus) !
On verra !
SEVRIEN- Membre
- Messages : 20088
Re: F35 Actualité
par Jeannot Mer 07 Nov 2012, 12:42
L'USAF est semble satisfaite des performances du F35
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
US Air Force praises early performance of Lockheed Martin F-35
feedback from US Air Force pilots and maintainers operating the [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien] at Eglin AFB, Florida, suggests the aircraft is performing better than its predecessors did at a similar stage of development.
The [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien] is in its infancy, but the stealthy type is already proving to be relatively stable from a maintenance standpoint, says Col Andrew Toth, commander of the 33rd Fighter Wing.
"The system right now is behaving as advertised, [although] occasionally, we will have some issues with it on the ground," he says. However, this is usually easily fixed by shutting the aircraft down and then restarting it,
Once the JSF is airborne there are "very limited" issues, with the aircraft's hardware, software and Pratt & Whitney F135 engine all performing well, he says.
"That's all good news," Toth says, but cautions: "We're a very young system and we still have very long way to go."
Sgt Skyler DeBoer, a senior maintainer with the 33rd Fighter Wing, who has previous experience on the Lockheed [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien] and [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien] programmes, says the F-35 has the edge on the Raptor. "Compared with the [F-22], this programme is way ahead of where the [F-22] was, software-wise, aircraft-wise," DeBoer says, "Lockheed has made great strides with this aircraft."
DeBoer attributes part of the improvement to better maintenance training. F-35 maintainers have received far more extensive instruction at this early stage of the JSF programme than on the F-22, he says.
Contractor support, too, is far better on the F-35 than was the case on the F-22, he insists. Requests to address specific problems are processed far more quickly through the F-35's autonomic logistics information system, with responses often received within hours, he says.
Additionally, the F-35's stealth coatings are much easier to work with than those used on the Raptor. Cure times for coating repairs are lower and many of the fasteners and access panels are not coated, further reducing the workload for maintenance crews.
According to Lockheed, some of the F-35's radar-absorbent materials are baked into the jet's composite skin, which means the JSF's stealthy signature is not easily degraded.
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
Jeannot- Membre
- Messages : 10002
Localisation : Vexin 78
Re: F35 Actualité
par Jeannot Mar 15 Jan 2013, 10:38
Le Pentagone place plus bas la barre pour le F35
--------------------
Pentagon lowers F-35 performance bar
The US Department of Defense is lowering the performance bar for the [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien] according to a new report by the Pentagon's director of operational test and evaluation (DOT&E).
The specifications for all three variants pertaining to transonic acceleration and sustained turn rates have been reduced. Worst hit in terms of acceleration is the US Navy's F-35C carrier-based model.
"The program announced an intention to change performance specifications for the F-35C, reducing turn performance from 5.1 to 5.0 sustained g's and increasing the time for acceleration from 0.8 Mach to 1.2 Mach by at least 43 seconds," reads the report prepared by J Michael Gilmore, the Pentagon's DOT&E. "These changes were due to the results of air vehicle performance and flying qualities evaluations."
The US Air Force F-35A's time has slipped by eight seconds while the US Marine Corps short take-off vertical landing (STOVL) F-35B's time has slipped by 16 seconds. However, turn rates for both the A and B models have been impacted more severely than the USN variant. Sustained turning performance for the F-35B is being reduced from 5G to 4.5G while the F-35A sinks from 5.3G to 4.6G according to the report.
All three variants are having problems with their horizontal tails. "Horizontal tail surfaces are experiencing higher than expected temperatures during sustained high‑speed / high‑altitude flight, resulting in delamination and scorching of the surface coatings and structure," the report reads. "All variants were restricted from operations outside of a reduced envelope until the test team added instrumentation to the tailbooms to monitor temperatures on the tail surfaces."
Meanwhile, the F-35B and C variants continue to have issues with transonic roll-off and buffeting. On the F-35B, the program introduced vehicle systems software to reduce rudder and flaperon hinge moment in the transonic/supersonic region. "The program expected to see improvements in transonic wing roll-off with these changes, but results were not available at the end of November 2012," the report reads.
Transonic buffet is more severe on the F-35C compared to the other variants due to its larger wing. "The program is making plans for investigating how to reduce the impact of transonic roll-off in the F-35C with the use of wing spoilers; however, detailed test plans are not complete," the report reads.
Meanwhile, the aircraft's crucial helmet-mounted display still has problems with jittery images and is not meeting specifications for night vision acuity. Additionally, a new problem called "green glow" has been discovered where light from the cockpit avionics displays leak into the helmet-mounted display and degrade visual acuity. However, the image latency is now within tolerances. "Latency of the projected imagery from the DAS [distributed aperture system] is currently down to 133 milliseconds, below the human factors derived maximum of 150 milliseconds, but still requires additional testing to verify adequacy," the report reads.
Perhaps in worst shape is the [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]'s software. According to the report, even the initial Block 1 software package is not complete, some 20% remains to be delivered and flight tested. An initial version of the more advanced, but still not combat capable, Block 2A software was delivered four months late to flight test. "In eight subsequent versions released to flight test, only a limited portion of the full, planned Block 2A capability (less than 50 percent) became available and delivered to production," the report reads. "The program made virtually no progress in the development, integration, and laboratory testing of any software beyond 2B. Block 3i software, required for delivery of Lot 6 aircraft and hosted on an upgraded processor, has lagged in integration and laboratory testing."
Meanwhile, structural durability testing continues, but the F-35B has hit a snag. "The program halted testing in December 2012 after multiple cracks were found in a bulkhead flange on the underside of the fuselage during the 7,000-hour inspection," the report reads. "Root cause analysis, correlation to previous model predictions, and corrective action planning were ongoing at the time of this report."
Lockheed could not immediately offer a substantive comment. "Our experts are going through it so it will be a while before we have detailed questions like yours answered," the company says, but adds, "From an Operational Test and Evaluation perspective, we fully expect to deliver a qualified product to OT&E as scheduled."
--------------------
Difficile de faire autrement mais quel serpent de mer cet avion ! Dépassement de budget à gogo et objectif non atteint !!
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
--------------------
Pentagon lowers F-35 performance bar
The US Department of Defense is lowering the performance bar for the [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien] according to a new report by the Pentagon's director of operational test and evaluation (DOT&E).
The specifications for all three variants pertaining to transonic acceleration and sustained turn rates have been reduced. Worst hit in terms of acceleration is the US Navy's F-35C carrier-based model.
"The program announced an intention to change performance specifications for the F-35C, reducing turn performance from 5.1 to 5.0 sustained g's and increasing the time for acceleration from 0.8 Mach to 1.2 Mach by at least 43 seconds," reads the report prepared by J Michael Gilmore, the Pentagon's DOT&E. "These changes were due to the results of air vehicle performance and flying qualities evaluations."
The US Air Force F-35A's time has slipped by eight seconds while the US Marine Corps short take-off vertical landing (STOVL) F-35B's time has slipped by 16 seconds. However, turn rates for both the A and B models have been impacted more severely than the USN variant. Sustained turning performance for the F-35B is being reduced from 5G to 4.5G while the F-35A sinks from 5.3G to 4.6G according to the report.
All three variants are having problems with their horizontal tails. "Horizontal tail surfaces are experiencing higher than expected temperatures during sustained high‑speed / high‑altitude flight, resulting in delamination and scorching of the surface coatings and structure," the report reads. "All variants were restricted from operations outside of a reduced envelope until the test team added instrumentation to the tailbooms to monitor temperatures on the tail surfaces."
Meanwhile, the F-35B and C variants continue to have issues with transonic roll-off and buffeting. On the F-35B, the program introduced vehicle systems software to reduce rudder and flaperon hinge moment in the transonic/supersonic region. "The program expected to see improvements in transonic wing roll-off with these changes, but results were not available at the end of November 2012," the report reads.
Transonic buffet is more severe on the F-35C compared to the other variants due to its larger wing. "The program is making plans for investigating how to reduce the impact of transonic roll-off in the F-35C with the use of wing spoilers; however, detailed test plans are not complete," the report reads.
Meanwhile, the aircraft's crucial helmet-mounted display still has problems with jittery images and is not meeting specifications for night vision acuity. Additionally, a new problem called "green glow" has been discovered where light from the cockpit avionics displays leak into the helmet-mounted display and degrade visual acuity. However, the image latency is now within tolerances. "Latency of the projected imagery from the DAS [distributed aperture system] is currently down to 133 milliseconds, below the human factors derived maximum of 150 milliseconds, but still requires additional testing to verify adequacy," the report reads.
Perhaps in worst shape is the [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]'s software. According to the report, even the initial Block 1 software package is not complete, some 20% remains to be delivered and flight tested. An initial version of the more advanced, but still not combat capable, Block 2A software was delivered four months late to flight test. "In eight subsequent versions released to flight test, only a limited portion of the full, planned Block 2A capability (less than 50 percent) became available and delivered to production," the report reads. "The program made virtually no progress in the development, integration, and laboratory testing of any software beyond 2B. Block 3i software, required for delivery of Lot 6 aircraft and hosted on an upgraded processor, has lagged in integration and laboratory testing."
Meanwhile, structural durability testing continues, but the F-35B has hit a snag. "The program halted testing in December 2012 after multiple cracks were found in a bulkhead flange on the underside of the fuselage during the 7,000-hour inspection," the report reads. "Root cause analysis, correlation to previous model predictions, and corrective action planning were ongoing at the time of this report."
Lockheed could not immediately offer a substantive comment. "Our experts are going through it so it will be a while before we have detailed questions like yours answered," the company says, but adds, "From an Operational Test and Evaluation perspective, we fully expect to deliver a qualified product to OT&E as scheduled."
--------------------
Difficile de faire autrement mais quel serpent de mer cet avion ! Dépassement de budget à gogo et objectif non atteint !!
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
Jeannot- Membre
- Messages : 10002
Localisation : Vexin 78
Re: F35 Actualité
par Jeannot Mar 15 Jan 2013, 10:46
Problèmes de peinture "Furtif" sur le F35
--------------------
Stealth coating peeling off from F-35′s horizontal tail surfaces
The Pentagon’s chief weapons tester says the F-35 failed to meet some of its testing goals last year even as the fighter made 18 percent more flights than planned.
The DOT&E report said the A-model completed 30 percent less test points than planned due to problems with it’s air refueling system and weapons bay doors.
Stealth coatings were also peeling off on horizontal tail surfaces due to higher-than-expected temperatures during high-speed, high-altitude flights.
Cracks were also found on the underside of the F-35B and testing was suspended in December.
The C-model has problems transferring video and imagery data to ships.
--------------------
Exactement dans la même veine que le post précédent
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
--------------------
Stealth coating peeling off from F-35′s horizontal tail surfaces
The Pentagon’s chief weapons tester says the F-35 failed to meet some of its testing goals last year even as the fighter made 18 percent more flights than planned.
The DOT&E report said the A-model completed 30 percent less test points than planned due to problems with it’s air refueling system and weapons bay doors.
Stealth coatings were also peeling off on horizontal tail surfaces due to higher-than-expected temperatures during high-speed, high-altitude flights.
Cracks were also found on the underside of the F-35B and testing was suspended in December.
The C-model has problems transferring video and imagery data to ships.
--------------------
Exactement dans la même veine que le post précédent
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
Jeannot- Membre
- Messages : 10002
Localisation : Vexin 78
Re: F35 Actualité
par Jeannot Sam 19 Jan 2013, 09:55
Des fuites clouent au sol la flotte de F-35B
--------------------
F-35B grounded after fueldraulic line failure
The [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien] Joint Program Office (JPO) has temporarily grounded the [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien] F-35B short take-off/vertical landing (STOVL) variant of the tri-service stealth fighter after the failure of a fueldraulic line in the aircraft's propulsion system. The fueldraulic line powers the actuator for the F-35B's STOVL exhaust vectoring system
--------------------
A suivre...
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
--------------------
F-35B grounded after fueldraulic line failure
The [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien] Joint Program Office (JPO) has temporarily grounded the [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien] F-35B short take-off/vertical landing (STOVL) variant of the tri-service stealth fighter after the failure of a fueldraulic line in the aircraft's propulsion system. The fueldraulic line powers the actuator for the F-35B's STOVL exhaust vectoring system
--------------------
A suivre...
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
Jeannot- Membre
- Messages : 10002
Localisation : Vexin 78
Re: F35 Actualité
par Moroder Lun 06 Mai 2013, 10:44
Suite aux annonces à répétition des problèmes des F-35 et au constat des dépassements de cout de ce programme
L'Australie réaffirme son engagement pour 100 Lockhed Martin F-35
Du politiquement correct ?
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
Combien de pays se considèrent scotchés ?
" Avec tout l'argent mis dans ce programme, on ne va pas abandonner maintenant "
L'Australie réaffirme son engagement pour 100 Lockhed Martin F-35
Du politiquement correct ?
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
Combien de pays se considèrent scotchés ?
" Avec tout l'argent mis dans ce programme, on ne va pas abandonner maintenant "
"There’s no change to our Joint Strike Fighter timetable as published in last year’s budget, which reflects and replicates the timetable for the United States’ Joint Strike Fighter project.
And we expect to see, on the basis of no further delays in that project, the first of our three squadrons arrive in 2020, with two planes being handed over to us for training purposes in the United States in 2014-2015," said Smith.
Moroder- CLUB
- Messages : 661
Re: F35 Actualité
par Voltige Mer 18 Sep 2013, 14:02
Les Pays Bas pour 37 LM F-35
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
La ministre néerlandaise de la Défense, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, doit annoncer cette décision dans la journée de mardi dans un document définissant sa vision à long terme pour l'armée néerlandaise, ont-elles ajouté.
Le F-35 Joint Strike Fighter a été conçu pour devenir le chasseur furtif de nouvelle génération de l'US Air Force et des alliés des Etats-Unis, mais son développement a pris plusieurs années de retard en raison de problèmes techniques et d'une hausse des coûts, 70% plus élevés que prévu.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
La ministre néerlandaise de la Défense, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, doit annoncer cette décision dans la journée de mardi dans un document définissant sa vision à long terme pour l'armée néerlandaise, ont-elles ajouté.
Le F-35 Joint Strike Fighter a été conçu pour devenir le chasseur furtif de nouvelle génération de l'US Air Force et des alliés des Etats-Unis, mais son développement a pris plusieurs années de retard en raison de problèmes techniques et d'une hausse des coûts, 70% plus élevés que prévu.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Voltige- CLUB
- Messages : 3425
Localisation : VERSAILLES
Page 11 sur 11 • 1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11
Page 11 sur 11
Permission de ce forum:
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
|
|