ECLIPSE 500
Page 1 sur 1
ECLIPSE 500
par SEVRIEN Mar 15 Mar 2011, 18:59
Peut-être qu'il aurait mieux valu rester moins ambitieux et poursuivre d'abord le projet d'origine avec les moteurs WILLIAMS !
--------------------
Lien :
Extrait Wikipedia :
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
Lien :
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]DATE:15/03/11. SOURCE:Flight International
Engine issues further reduce Eclipse top altitude
By [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
--------------------
Lien :
Extrait Wikipedia :
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
Certains disent que l'erreur fut de permettre l'augmenation du poids, ... parce qu'illd fut mal conçue et mal maîtrisée ! Il y a, sans doute, du vrai dans cette appréciation!Originally Eclipse selected a pair of Williams International EJ-2 engines (a production variant of the FJ22/FJX-2) for the Eclipse 500, but as the aircraft's weight increased, performance was not satisfactory.
Et, le retard n'a pas permis de "get it right" ![Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien] agreed to participate in the project, and modified the design of their PW615 engine, designating it the [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]. The prototype Eclipse 500 first flew with the Williams engines in [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]. The redesign to incorporate the new engines resulted in a significant delay to the development program. The first flight of the Eclipse 500 with the new engines occurred on December 31, 2004.
An Eclipse press release says that its aircraft is "the quietest jet aircraft" and that it is "quieter than virtually all multi engine turboprop and piston aircraft".
Lien :
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]DATE:15/03/11. SOURCE:Flight International
Engine issues further reduce Eclipse top altitude
By [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
Rare pour les moteurs PWC (ce n'est pas P&W, société mère ) !
Vrai problème moteur !The Federal Aviation Administration airworthiness directive supersedes a 2008 mandate that limited the aircraft from flying higher than 37,000ft, 4,000ft below its maximum certificated altitude of 41,000ft.
That directive was prompted by "several" incidents in which the 900lb-thrust (4kN) engines surged due to hard carbon build-up in the combustors, a problem that requires pilots to reduce thrust on the affected engine.
Cela fait désordre !"The unsafe condition of engine surges due to hard carbon build-up blocking the static vanes has continued to occur at 37,000ft altitude and lower," says the FAA in the 10 March final AD announcement. "Six known events have occurred, five of which were at or below 37,000ft altitude and four of which were in a two-week period."
Hmm ! Que vont dire les anti-RR ?Impacts include having to reduce thrust or having to shut down the affected engine, says the FAA. "It is also possible that this could affect both engines at the same time, requiring dual engine shutdown".
On applique des mesures conservatioires, en atttendant de découvrir la "root cause", ... n'est-ce pas ?As in its 2008 AD, the FAA says the altitude limitation remains an interim action while Pratt & Whitney Canada and Canadian regulators develop solutions.
P&WC says the issue occurs "in certain operational conditions on some aircraft" when flying above 30,000ft for more than 75min.
C'est bien !The engine-maker says a new combustor liner it developed and tested with airframer Eclipse Aerospace to prevent the build-up recently completed final development testing "and the certification process is now under way".
Certains devraient en prendre bonne note ! Ils pourraient apprendre quelque chose !As for the existing fleet, P&WC says operational recommendations it developed previously with Eclipse, Transport Canada and the FAA remain valid. Those include "respecting a reasonable cruise time limitation of 75min when operating above 30,000ft", says P&WC.
SEVRIEN- Membre
- Messages : 20088
Page 1 sur 1
Permission de ce forum:
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum